![]() When might we reach fault tolerance? Most hardware players are hesitant to reveal their development road maps, but a few have publicly shared their plans. However, many say that imperfect fault tolerance does not necessarily make quantum-computing systems unusable. Please email us at: disagree on whether quantum computers can create significant business value before they are fully fault tolerant. If you would like information about this content we will be happy to work with you. We strive to provide individuals with disabilities equal access to our website. We then outline a path forward and how industry decision makers can start their efforts in quantum computing. In the report Quantum computing: An emerging ecosystem and industry use cases, we discuss the evolution of the quantum-computing industry and dive into the technology’s possible commercial uses in pharmaceuticals, chemicals, automotive, and finance-fields that may derive significant value from quantum computing in the near term. To help leaders start planning, we conducted extensive research and interviewed 47 experts around the globe about quantum hardware, software, and applications the emerging quantum-computing ecosystem possible business use cases and the most important drivers of the quantum-computing market. Change may come as early as 2030, as several companies predict they will launch usable quantum systems by that time. ![]() Leaders should start to formulate their quantum-computing strategies, especially in industries, such as pharmaceuticals, that may reap the early benefits of commercial quantum computing. Still, the activity suggests that chief information officers and other leaders who have been keeping an eye out for quantum-computing news can no longer be mere bystanders. Therefore, our report should be used as a guide to areas to explore further, not a definitive or exhaustive road map. Some experts have noted that not enough time and resources have been invested in developing use cases to reliably indicate which ones are more or less viable. ![]() This and other open questions lead to varying estimates of quantum computing’s potential value for different industries. In discussions of quantum-computing hardware, a lack of transparency makes it difficult to interpret different groups’ announced findings-and to extrapolate these results to business use cases. Experts also disagree on the importance of fault tolerance (having systems in which technical noise does not compromise the quality and coherence of performance). ![]() The relative importance of the quantity and quality of qubits (the basic building blocks of a quantum computer) is also uncertain, and there is no commonly accepted alternative measure of quantum-computing systems’ performance. Experts differ on whether they believe quantum supremacy-when a quantum computer resolves a problem that the most powerful conventional computer cannot process in a practical amount of time-has ever been demonstrated. Similarly, the optimal combination of collaboration and competition is not yet clear when it comes to applying the technology in commercial settings.Įven basic technical considerations are being debated. However, topics such as the state of development of the technology, standards and metrics for performance, and the value of different business cases are still under debate. At this early stage of quantum computing, the most important question is around the fit between the technology and business problems, not the technology itself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |